cyberdelic-research

Trigger: /cyberdelic-research

Deep research into consciousness technologies and endo-technology science. Covers endo-technology evidence base, archaeoacoustic frequency research, consciousness assessment models, and altered states vs. traits literature. Parallel research stages for efficiency.

Agents

• Hyperhumanism Researcher - Core research and Smith's framework
• Traditions Scholar - Historical and cultural context
• Clinical Researcher - Clinical evidence assessment
• Ethics Guardian - Evidence standards and claim review

Inputs

Input	Required	Description
topic	Yes	Research focus (e.g., "endo-technology evidence base")
depth	No	quick (2-3 pages), standard (5-8), comprehensive (10-15)

Outputs

• research-brief.md - Integrated research document
• evidence-synthesis.md - Cross-domain evidence analysis
• technology-assessment.md - Endo-technology evaluation

Examples

Endo-technology evidence overview:

/cyberdelic-research "endo-technology evidence base" --depth standard

Comprehensive archaeoacoustic review:

/cyberdelic-research "archaeoacoustic consciousness effects" --depth comprehensive

Quick consciousness models summary:

/cyberdelic-research "consciousness assessment models" --depth quick

Research Domains

Domain	Key Sources
Endo-Technology Evidence	Systematic reviews, practice-specific RCTs
Archaeoacoustic Research	Jahn & Dunne 1992, Cook et al. 2008, Smith et al. 2023
Consciousness Models	Milliere 6D, Hood Scale, Neurophenomenology
Altered States vs. Traits	Goleman & Davidson 2017, neuroplasticity

Workflow

Research stages run in parallel for efficiency:

intake
  ├── primary_research (hyperhumanism-researcher)
  ├── traditions_research (traditions-scholar)      [parallel]
  └── clinical_context (clinical-researcher)
      ↓
  synthesis (hyperhumanism-researcher)
      ↓
  ethics_review (ethics-guardian)

Evidence Standards

All research output must:

• Support all claims with citations
• Note sample sizes for empirical studies
• Label evidence levels (theoretical / preliminary / moderate / well-established)
• State limitations for every finding
• Use "suggests" language, never "proves"
• Distinguish Smith's theoretical work from underlying research

Quality Gates

Before output is finalized:

• Multiple research streams integrated coherently
• Contradictions between sources acknowledged
• Evidence gaps identified
• Recommendations grounded in evidence level
• Pharmaco-technology exclusion maintained
• Primary sources preferred over secondary
• Peer-reviewed sources prioritized

---

Honest research in service of human flourishing. Rigorous about what we know, humble about what we don't.