Skip to main content

context-engineering

Trigger: /context-engineering

Designs the experiential container around a practice: physical setting, body priming, temporal framing, social setting, intention, and re-entry. Based on Carl Hayden Smith's Contextology. Usable on its own to prepare any space for practice, or as a preparation step ahead of any other healing-swarm skill.

Agents

  • Context Engineer - Container design across all six Contextology dimensions
  • Accessibility Auditor - Sensory, mobility, and cognitive access review
  • Ethics Guardian - Consent, invitation-not-demand framing, and re-entry safety review

Inputs

InputRequiredDescription
focusYesThe practice and setting to prepare for (e.g., "20-minute breath practice at home, alone")
socialNoalone (default), dyad, group
durationNobrief (20 min total), standard (35 min total), deep (55 min total)

Outputs

  • context-design.md - Complete container design across all six dimensions, with accessibility adaptations and a re-entry plan folded in

Examples

Solo home practice container:

/context-engineering "20-minute breath practice at home, alone"

Dyad session container:

/context-engineering "prepare a paired session" --social dyad

Deep integration container:

/context-engineering "closing container after a difficult session" --duration deep

The Six Contextology Dimensions

DimensionDesign question
Physical settingWhat should the person see, hear, and feel in the space?
Body primingWhat posture and breath state should the practice begin from?
Temporal framingWhen is this best done, and what buffers surround it?
Social settingAlone, dyad, or group, and what facilitation stance fits?
IntentionWhy this practice, why now, held as an invitation?
Re-entryWhat does the person return to, and how do we soften the landing?

Container Durations

DurationTotalArrival BufferPracticeRe-entry Buffer
Brief20 min2 min13 min5 min
Standard35 min3 min25 min7 min
Deep55 min5 min40 min10 min

Research Basis

Evidence level: Theoretical (framework)

Contextology is Carl Hayden Smith's framework for treating context as a deliberate design surface. His estimate that surrounding conditions shape roughly 80% of an experience's outcome is his own working figure, not a measured research finding, and every context-design.md attributes it that way. The broader claim that "set and setting" shape subjective experience does have research heritage of its own, most visibly in the psychedelic-assisted therapy literature (Leary & Metzner's original framing, later synthesized by Hartogsohn) and in placebo/expectancy research. This skill borrows the concept, never the substance: pharmaco-technologies are hard excluded from every container it designs.

Safety

  • shared/crisis-response.md is loaded for this skill. The Context Engineer owns re-entry, and re-entry is exactly where adverse reactions surface — a destabilized return needs a crisis path, not only a "stop early" option.
  • shared/contraindications.md screens whatever practice the container wraps.
  • Pharmaco-technologies are a hard, non-negotiable exclusion. No context is ever designed around a substance-based experience.
  • A stopping option is required in every container: permission to end early and re-enter gently at any point.
  • Intention is held as an invitation, never a demand. Ethics Guardian escalates if framing drifts toward pressure or deficiency language.

Quality Gates

Before output is finalized:

  • All six Contextology dimensions addressed
  • Arrival buffer and re-entry buffer both present
  • Context estimate attributed to Smith ("~80%"), never stated as fact
  • Sensory, mobility, and cognitive accessibility adaptations included
  • Pharmaco-exclusion enforced
  • Re-entry never drops a person into a demanding task
  • A stopping option offered

The room shapes the practice as much as the practice shapes the room.